Love, a mathematical proof
Let ❤ be love.
i<3u, i∈ℂ
Love is Complex
3<3 ⇒ 3≠3 ⚡
3∙❤ = ❤❤❤ = ❤³ ⚡
Love does not follow any rule
3<3 ∧ i<3u ⇒ ?
Love is not logical
❤∈ℝ
Love is real
❤
Love stands on its own.
NoWhereBlog
Il futuro è adesso, ma non svegliatemi, che ho sonno
NoWhereMan
Friday, April 23, 2010 11:32:26
Tra l’altro SPASS dà “completion found”, quindi è consistente.
NoWhereMan
Friday, April 23, 2010 11:35:11
Also, see: Extreme, More Than Words http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrIiLvg58SY
A⊃Σ*; w₁,w₂∈A :
love: U →Μ; u∈U, μ∈Μ
feel(u) : Love = love(u, μ) ⇒ Love ∈ ℝ
(more than words to show you feel / that your love for me is real)
Morpheu5
Saturday, April 24, 2010 04:29:34
I will disprove you, like paper disproves Spock.
3∙❤ = ❤+❤+❤ ≠ ❤³
Your conclusion’d have followed IF love didn’t follow any rules, not the other way around.
And you’re professor, Dr. Vacchi?
(yep, I’m a jerk
NoWhereMan
Saturday, April 24, 2010 04:52:57
Oh GAWD, I’ve been proven wrong. My love is a joke!
I never said that 3∙❤ = ❤❤❤ = ❤³ implies that love doesn’t follow any rule
that’s just showing it doesn’t (for further reference, see [Munroe, http://xkcd.com/55/ ])
Also, your lack of romance is disturbing
Thanks for playing, though.